Written by: Sam Orlando
STAUNTON, VIRGINIA - When the BBC reaches out to you, it usually signals a moment of prestige—an international accolade, a feature on groundbreaking work, or at least a polite inquiry about your organization’s mission. But when we got the call, it wasn’t any of those things. Instead, it was to ask one simple, baffling question: “Is your newsreader an AI?”
That’s right, folks. Breaking Through News, a platform known for delivering sharp, impactful reporting, has apparently ascended to such great heights that our YouTube videos now have global media titans wondering if we’re powered by futuristic robots—or just incredibly convincing humans. For those keeping track, this is the same BBC that produces some of the world’s most acclaimed programming, now playing Sherlock Holmes with our newsreader.
The Call That Started It All
It began innocently enough. At 12:06 PM on Friday, we received a message from Rose E. Nugee, a journalist with BBC World News. The inquiry wasn’t about our reporting, our reach, or even our cataclysmic exposé about potholes last month (which we thought was our most controversial story to date). Nope. Rose wanted to know who voices our news videos.
To her credit, she was polite. “We’d like to know if the newsreader in your videos is a voiceover artist or whether it is an AI-generated voice,” she wrote. We were flattered—and slightly unnerved. Was this a compliment? A covert legal probe? Or perhaps an elaborate prank by one of our competitors?
Is It David Attenborough?
Rose didn’t stop there. She also suggested that our newsreader sounds like David Attenborough—yes, the David Attenborough. While we’ve always admired his ability to narrate the life cycle of a sea cucumber with poetic gravitas, we had no idea our own humble voice could draw such comparisons. Naturally, we didn’t know whether to blush or call our lawyers.
Let’s set the record straight: our newsreader is not, in fact, David Attenborough... so unless Mr. Attenborough has been moonlighting for us in secret, we can confirm that he is also not on our payroll. What we can’t confirm is why the BBC is suddenly interested in the mechanics of our operation. Is it a tribute? An exposé? A David-versus-Goliath narrative in the making?
The Bigger Questions
Of course, this raises a few questions of our own.
Why is the BBC calling us?
Are we about to be the subject of a 4 AM documentary about the ethics of AI in journalism? (Because hey, we’d like to watch.)
And finally, what does David Attenborough think of all this? We’d like to know.
A Plot Worthy of MI6
The whole interaction felt less like journalism and more like the opening scene of a spy thriller. Encrypted messages, vague inquiries, and a 3:30 PM video call “to discuss further.” That 3:30 call would be 8:30 on a Saturday night in London, a curious choice of timing for a routine business call. Was this research? Reconnaissance? A test to see how long it would take before we cracked under the pressure of being compared to a living legend?
And why the sudden urgency? Our email “doesn’t work,” Rose said. (It does. But sure, let’s blame the tech.) Is this the BBC way of telling us we’re next in line for some kind of mysterious investigative segment? If so, we humbly request to air before the 4 AM time slot.
Our Response
For now, we’re playing it cool. We told Rose we’d get back to her—though not before double-checking that our newsreader wasn’t secretly David Attenborough all along. In the meantime, we’ll continue doing what we do best: delivering quality news while the BBC tries to figure out if we’re staffed by humans, cyborgs, or David Attenborough himself.
So, if you catch a BBC program about the rise of AI in independent media this week and they don’t name names, just know—we’re probably the stars of that story. Stay tuned.
Comments